Evaluation+Rubric

Rubric for the Assessment of a Wiki Assess This Rubric
 * || **Developing [1]** || **Satisfactory [2]** || **Good [3]** || **Excellent [4]** ||
 * **//Content//** || In need of additional or more focused content. Several factual corrections need to be made. || Includes most essential content but needs some factual corrections. || Portrays good topic knowledge and includes all essential content. || Deals with topics in depth, with supporting details and examples. Shows excellent grasp of topics. ||
 * **//Navigation//** || Structure needs to be made more clear and linear. || Structure is mostly organized logically. || Good structure and organization, but still room for improvement. || Excellent content organization, good use of headings and lists, good grouping of materials. ||
 * **//Page Layout and Design//** || Fonts, graphics, colours and effects are often distracting, confusing or hard on the eyes. || Fonts, graphics, colours and effects are occasionally distracting. || Fonts, graphics, colours and effects complement the presentation and content and are aesthetically pleasing. || Fonts, graphics, colours and effects are put to excellent use and enhance presentation and content. ||
 * **//Audiovisual Material//** || In need of additional or more relevant audiovisual material to support written content. || Contains some audiovisual material which supports the written content. || Contains audiovisual material which supports and enhances the content. || Makes excellent use of audiovisual material which supports and develops the content, and demonstrates good research. ||
 * **//Spelling and Grammar//** || In need of several technical corrections. || In need of some technical corrections. || Contains very few technical errors. || Contains no spelling or grammar mistakes. ||
 * **//Peer Contribution and Collaboration//** || Needs to provide more opportunities for feedback and collaboration to avoid minimal or no contribution by peers to the development of the Wiki. || Provides some opportunities for feedback. There is Moderate contribution by peers to the development of the Wiki. || Encourages collaboration and feedback. Peers take an active part in the development of the Wiki. || Provides ample opportunities for interaction and collaboration, facilitating feedback with accessible links to discussion areas. ||
 * **//Expression//** || Language could be more colourful or more personalized. || Satisfactory use of expression with room for improvement. || Good range of expression. Style of writing retains the reader’s attention. || Writing is very expressive and open with an emphasis on humour. ||



 